The Liberals should read their own news reports in full before commenting on them. And they also need to read the US Constitution as well.
Yes they are at it again. The fake news, aka the Liberal mainstream media and propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. Are spreading editorials as news about Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential elections.
This is of course to undermine our lawfully and legitimately elected President Donald J. Trump. Simply because the Liberals don’t want the rule of law or a Republican in office ever again. And they still don’t understand why Hillary Clinton lost the election. So it has to be massive fraud committed by the Republicans and the Trump Administration with the help and backing of Russia.
But this whole idea and notion is absurd. Even the very Liberal media in their very reports state there is no evidence to back up their statements. That makes the reports pure fiction.
The rank and file Liberal repeats the headlines without reading the details. Shouting out, stopping traffic, raising lawlessness, and igniting various flame wars across the internet.
If they actually read the details they would see there is no evidence to the allegations. And if they were to read the Constitution and laws of the United States they would also know that to be charged and found guilty of a crime, evidence is required.
Like it or not, Donald Trump is the President. Try again in four years with a better candidate that actually resonates with the voters. Our laws are clear. Stop with the false accusations simply because your chosen candidate lost the election. It happens. We lost 2 elections in a row. Our laws are clear, when you have some hard evidence against the President for some real wrong doing. Bring it forward.
Otherwise please stop writing fiction against the President.
Social media is full of memes. Some of these are funny of course and they are meant to be that way. Most however are political in nature attempting to drive some point in some direction.
The memes produced and copied by the leftist are full of errors. Take this one for just one example.
I keep seeing the ending stanzas from the poem “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus which was written in 1883. Every American is familiar with the lines that read:
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me
But this is not the beginning of the poem nor the compleat ending of it either. It is simply taken out of context like many things the Liberals do to “prove” their points.
These words do not appear anywhere on the Statue of Liberty. They are on a bronze plaque inside the greater monument. The poem itself was written as a fundraiser to raise funds needed to build the pedestal that the Statue of Liberty stand upon.
Even the Statue of Liberty was not build or designed as a symbol of immigration. It is a symbol of American Liberty shining out over the whole world. Lady Liberty is “Liberatas” the Roman goddess and she holds in one hand a torch lighting the way to liberty and freedom. And in the other she holds the Tablet of Law. At her feet rests broken chains. There is only One Law the is represented by breaking chains. That is the Law of God found in the Holy Scriptures of the Bible.
The Statue of Liberty was commissioned, designed, and built in France and was given to the American people by the French as a celebration of the American Independence. Please know your history before you go grabbing symbols that don’t mean what you think they mean.
MoveOn and other progressive, leftist, and liberal organizations keep calling for Senator Chuck Grassley to “do his job.” Which to them means to hold hearings and appoint President Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. They site the Constitution stating the Senate’s job is to advise and consent.
These liberal groups fail to enforce the same “rules” when a Republican President’s nominee is being ignored or rejected by a liberal Democrat controlled Senate. And they forget all of history which shows this cycle repeating itself in every Administration.
Likewise these liberal groups don’t understand plain simple English. They fully believe that “advise and consent” means that the Senate will approve any nominee given to the Courts. If this was truly what that phrase meant then Judge Robert Bork would have been on the Supreme Court before his death. But of course the definition would change when a Republican nominates a conservative Judge.
No “advise and consent” does not guarantee the judicial nominee will be accepted. It does not guarantee the judicial nominee will even get a hearing. The Senate has the full right to reject the President’s nominee outright. The only thing a President can do is make a Recess appointment if the Senate goes into a recess. It is in the President’s best interest to submit another nominee.
Just like a parent not giving their consent to a child’s activity at school. Consent is not automatic in most cases and not at all guaranteed to be given. The Senate is not a rubber stamp to the actions of the President.
The Senate is a check and balance against the actions of an executive branch overreaching it’s Constitutional authority. Each branch of government is a separate but equal power. Interwoven to insure liberty over tyranny.
The role of the Senate is either confirm the President’s nominee to the Court or to deny it. In either case the Senate is doing it’s job and so is Senator Chuck Grassley.