image_pdfimage_print

Burden of Proof

The alleged event took place 36 years ago. It was not a Federal Crime and therefore the FBI has rightly refused to investigate the matter further. Additionally it may have taken place in the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia. Even wrongfully assuming the alleged event was the highest felony sexual based crime. It has a statute of limitations of 15 years. So any charges or accusations should have been made at least 18 years ago it not before to be legally valid.

The Left insists that men who are accused of any sexually based crime are guilty until proven innocent. However, our Constitution and laws decree that the burden of proof is on the accuser and prosecution. And that all citizens are innocent until proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, guilty. The Left’s mindset is an abomination against Liberty and freedom within this Republic.

However we will look at the accusation to see if it has any merit what so ever, even though the accused cannot be charged or tried for the event due to the statute of limitations within the District of Columbia. According to Ms. Ford this is what happened 3 and a half decades ago.

When she was 15 years of age, she was at a high school party. This was a co-ed party with girls and boys attending. There was underage drinking going on and she admits that she had been drinking and was in fact drunk during this party.

Two boys, one being now identified as Supreme Court Nominee Mr. Kavanaugh, were also present. These 2 boys and herself were drunk and ended up alone in a bedroom at the house were the party was being held.

One of the boys covered Ms. Ford’s mouth to prevent her from screaming. The other boy, now identified as Mr. Kavanaugh, was on top of Ms. Ford.

However, since both boys had been heavily drinking they had fallen off the bed onto one another during their struggle with Ms. Ford. At this point Ms. Ford escapes from the two entangled boys.

What happened after that is not yet known. Did Ms. Ford leave the party or did she remain there? Where there any adults present at this party? These and more are questions that need to asked.

What is known is that the incident was never reported to an adult, a teacher, the police, or Ms. Ford’s parents. Had it been there would have been an entire chain of events that simply did not happen. It is believed that Ms. Ford did tell a few close friends about it but it was kept silent after that.

From my own experience, I too was 15 years of age at the same time. Back in 1982 when this event allegedly took place. I cannot remember a single thing in detail of what I did during that year. I can make some guesses of course but the accuracy would be in doubt. Add a drunken party to the mix and the odds go way down at recalling anything with any real accuracy about it.

Given that Ms. Ford admits to being drunk at this teenage party calls her entire accusation into question. Especially 36 years later. Did it happen as she said, did any of it happen at all? Or is it all a fabrication of lies?

Ms. Ford and her fellow Democratic Leftists call this alleged event “attempted rape”. That is very strong language to use on an event that was just “remembered” so recently from so long ago. At best, if was still chargeable, it would be assault.

Now I will admit that a teenage male has a lot of sexual tension, drive, and desires. That is indisputable, but not proof of attempted rape. And being drunk can lower ones inhibitions as well. This can happen with any drunk individual, teenager and adult. But it is still not proof of attempted rape. And no where in Ms. Ford’s telling of this event does it mention that either boy was without clothing or even had partial clothing. This does cast doubt on the attempted rape accusation.

On the accused side of this story is Mr. Kavanaugh. He states simply that the alleged event did not take place. But here, I do have to say that IF it did happen as Ms. Ford states, it is possible that Mr. Kavanaugh’s memory of the event is long gone and may not remember that it happened at all.

Also being drunk and being a minor does not excuse such behavior. It was assault if nothing more serious. But we will never know the true intent, if the event actually did take place. And as I stated at the beginning, this happened too long ago to be a legal issue.

In our political arena and climate this kind of accusation sets a dangerous president. To be able to accuse a member of an opposition party of sexual misconduct from an unprovable vantage point decades in the past in order to prevent that person from seeking and obtaining political office is evil. It destroys liberty and it undermines our Republic. It can ruin lives and careers both public and private. All from an accusation that is unprovable and in some cases maybe completely false.

The burden of proof is on the accuser or prosecution within our Republic. And this includes testimony before a Senate hearing.

Ms. Ford also does not state when and where exactly this party was located either. Casting further doubt on the event. Give this information and we can find where Mr. Kavanaugh was located then.

Ms. Ford has offered no proof and Mr. Kavanaugh denies the event. The 2nd boy is unknown. So there are no other witnesses to bring forth new information. There is also no DNA or other evidence at all. Nothing.

We only have the word of a Democratic Party member and donor. One who has been involved in protests against the current Administration. One who believes that the President is not her president. Ms. Ford’s own actions would indicate that she would be against any nomination made by the current Administration to the High Court, no matter the person’s character, qualifications, or even gender.

Ms. Ford has not protested or brought up accusations against Mr. Kavanaugh in his past appointments to the Federal Court system. He has been before the Senate Judicial Committee before and was confirmed by the Senate. No word of any sexual misconduct. Only now, when he is being nominated to sit on the High Court does she come forward with this accusation.

What Ms. Ford did do was to send a letter to Senator Feinstein, a Democratic Senator on the Judicial Committee. Senator Feinstein is a well known Leftist and her public statements show a strong bias against the male gender. Within Ms. Ford’s letter, she demanded that the FBI investigate the alleged event. Thankfully the FBI has refused this unauthorized demand on their time and funds. It accusation does not fall under FBI jurisdiction. Ms. Ford, if you want a private investigation, hire a private investigator to do it, the FBI is not at your disposal.

Senator Feinstein did exactly what the Democratic Senators accused Senator Grassely of doing on the 1st day of the hearing. Not giving out documents in time for them to be read. Senator Feinstein received Ms. Ford’s letter on July 30th. And sat on it until the 11th hour, only then revealing its existence in an attempt to stall the vote or deny the nomination in committee.

At the time of this writing, Ms. Ford has agreed to testify but not yet agreed to do so by the Monday deadline. She demands protections from the Republican Senators. Unless she is going into a witness relocation program, she isn’t entitled to any extra protections. She is not a witnesses but the accuser. Every citizen has the right to face their accuser.

She has been given a deadline, she either meets such deadline or doesn’t. She is then either subpoenaed and brought before the Senate Judicial Committee or is found in contempt if she does not appear and goes to jail. If she elects not to testify, then the Senate moves forward with their confirmation and the accusation is stricken from the record.

I personally would like her to come and testify. If the alleged event actually took place there are unanswered questions about it that need answers that only she can give. Yes it will be hard. That happens anytime someone in an other’s accuser. And I know there is a negative stigma attached to victims of sexual assault. That is unfortunate, but she needs to be strong.

I have already written about how I don’t think Mr. Kavanaugh should be on the bench at any level in our courts. He is part of the problem of black robed tyrants based on some of his testimony and other statements prior to his hearing. However, he is the best available candidate that can be put on the High Court bench at this time and place in our history.

And if such testimony of Ms. Ford removes all doubt to her accusation, then I will join those in stating Mr. Kavanaugh should not be confirmed. But that burden of proof is on Ms. Ford and Ms. Ford alone.

Share This:

 

Supreme Court Nominees

Although Brett Kavanaugh isn’t a bad choice. I do have some reservations about him as a potential Supreme Court Justice. Or any potential or active Judge for that matter who believes any of the following statements.

Roe v. Wade or any opinion by any court is established or settled law.

This is a dangerous falsehood. The Courts do not make or enact laws. That is the power granted to the legislature alone. Any opinion issued by the Courts is jut that, an opinion. It is not law, established or otherwise.

As a people, we have given way too much power to these un-elected black robed tyrants than what was ever envisioned by our Founding Fathers. We need to educate the American people properly on the role of the Courts as they were created by the Founding Fathers.

Our Founding Fathers knew of the dangers of a run away court. So the purposely limited the power of the judicial branch. It is not co-equal to the legislative or executive branches. It is kept separate to limit powers from being held by one group or one man. The Courts powers are very specific and spelled out in whole within the pages of the Constitution.

The Courts do not interpret law. This makes me cringe every time I hear this lie. The power to interpret law is part of the powers granted to the people because it is not explicitly granted to any branch of government. In fact this is exactly what a jury does when they deliberate the outcome of a trial.

The role of the court and the judge is to determine to what extent the law was violated by anyone’s actions. In other words, the role of the courts is to apply the laws.

Do not believe the Leftist lie that the court interpret anything. They do not.

Likewise the courts do not have the power of “Judicial Review”. This power was not granted in the Constitution for good reason. With it, the courts can subjugate the legislative and the executive branches in a complete reversal of power. This is a power the court granted to itself in the opinion of Marbury v. Madison in 1803.

So the courts changed the powers it had by a simple majority vote between just 6 people. This was and is a blatant power grab and completely unconstitutional. And why the Founding Fathers did not grant this power to the courts at the founding of our nation.

Although the opinion issues is half correct. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution. It is not the Courts job to interpret the Constitution or any other law passed by the legislatures.

Any potential justice or current judge who believes these lies is not qualified to site on the bench in my opinion. And further more they are a danger to the continued existence of this Republic and it’s liberties, and they should be removed from such appointments.

Brett Kavanaugh is not the best man for the high court. But he is the best man we can currently get appointed to it. There is still a long road and a lot of work to be done before we can ever hope to have the Republic restored to its founders vision.

Share This:

 

Good Men Vote

Donald Trump can be and should be the next President of the United States. There is no alternative available.

In November there is the choice of Clinton or Trump. Voting a 3rd party candidate like Johnson will only hurt Trump’s chances of winning. Not voting at all will only hurt Trump’s chances. And voting for a write-in candidate will only hurt Trump’s chances.

At no time in history has any of these options helped the opposition candidate. It will only prevent the opposition candidate from winning the election. And that means another 4 more years of liberal socialist policies being forced on America.

Please see and understand history before November if you are thinking about those options. This election is the most important election of this generation. And will have lasting consequences for ourselves, our children, and even our grandchildren.

The next President of the United States will shape public policy and the Supreme Court for decades to come. Do you really want that power to be given to Hillary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton will continue the Socialization of America. She will appoint Barak Obama to the Supreme Court. Hillary Clinton will let thousands of non-vetted refugees from Syria into the United States and give countless illegals free citizenship.

Under Hillary Clinton racial tensions will continue to rise. Sharia law will be upheld in our Courts. And terrorism will run wild in our streets and neighborhoods.

Donald Trump. Love him or hate him. Is the only way to prevent that America from happening in this election. It is not moral to allow by action or inaction the election of Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump is for a free enterprise in all sectors. He will not appoint liberal socialists to the Supreme Court. Donald Trump will not let in non-vetted refugees and will deport illegal aliens found in our borders by following our laws.

Under Donald Trump we will be a United America. Sharia law will not be our law as it violates our Constitution on every point. And terrorists will fear and never even dream of harming the United States.

It has been said that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Don’t be a good man and do nothing this November. Do the right thing and cast your vote for the only candidate on the ballot that is capable of winning and preventing the socialist downfall of America. Donald Trump.

Share This:

 

The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has had very left leaning judges of late appointed to its ranks. Many of the recent opinions have been 5 to 4. Sometimes 5 on the Conservative side of issues and sometimes 5 on the Liberal side of issues. The very balance of the Court hangs at the edge of Liberty.

Justice Antonin Scalia, nominated by President Reagan has died. This gives President Obama an opportunity to nominate a new Justice to the Supreme Court. Many past presidents, in their last year of office, have not nominated a Justice and left this task up to the incoming president.

I firmly believe that Obama, wanting to fundamentally rebuild Amerika, will break from this tradition. He will nominate a new Justice to the Court tipping the balance from Liberty to tyranny.

And if he is blocked by the Senate he will appoint a Justice by recess appointment or some other means. This is Obama’s legacy.

Share This: