Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

74 Views

It wasn’t that long ago that your humble correspondent was applying to college for the first time. Although I didn’t get accepted everywhere I wanted to go (who knew women’s colleges had such strict enrollment guidelines), I did manage to get into a college I liked.

Such was the case for Second Amendment fan and Stoneman High School shooting survivor Kyle Kashuv. He applied to Harvard, got accepted, and then had that acceptance taken away from him after it came out he used racist language in a social media post. Kashuv and his supporters questioned the decision while Leftists mocked him, all the while saying “actions have consequences.”

Which brings up an interesting question: what are consequences to Leftists? I’m glad I asked! Oh, and I’m glad you asked, too.

consequences

What Leftists think it means – when bad people, usually Republicans and conservatives, get their comeuppance for bad behavior

What it really means – Karma giving you a Shiva-style bitchslap

Let me make one thing perfectly clear. Kashuv exercised poor judgment and a lack of maturity. Racism, even in jest, isn’t cool. It doesn’t matter if you’re 5, 50, or 500, you just don’t throw around racial slurs, especially not on social media. I won’t defend him for what he said.

Yet, our fiends…I mean friends on the Left don’t have the same set of standards. If a Leftist says something stupid and racist, they are allowed to apologize in a fashion, the matter is dropped, and anyone who brings it up in the future, even if the Leftist in question makes the same or similar statements after the apology, is considered a meanie-head. A great example of this is the late Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat from West Virginia. For those of you unfamiliar with the Senator’s history, he was an actual member of the Ku Klux Klan and used racist language every so often (a certain interview where he talked about “white n-words” comes to mind). Yet, Leftists a) don’t see the problem with their side being literally linked to the Klan, and b) say it’s water under the bridge because he apologized, essentially saying it was a youthful indiscretion that he felt bad to be a part of.

If only Kashuv had apologi…I see here he did, and shortly after his racist posts came to light. As a result, the Left should forgive him and drop the issue, right?

Nope. When it comes to Kashuv and other Republicans/conservatives, once you’re a racist, you’re always a racist.

The Leftist double standard on consequences hits at the core of its ideology. They truly believe they are morally and intellectually superior to everyone who isn’t them. That’s why they look the other way when someone with the moral instincts of an alley cat in heat while supporting the Leftist agenda gets caught acting true to his or her nature. To them, Leftists can’t be held accountable by anyone but themselves because anyone else isn’t a peer.

Not only that, but Leftists are allowed to “evolve” on an issue, no matter what. It wasn’t that long ago President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were vocal supporters of traditional marriage, while during that same time President Donald Trump was a vocal supporter of same sex marriages and gay rights in general. Yet, the former two can flip-flop like John Kerry working the griddle at IHOP without so much as a sideways glance while painting the latter as a homophobic bigot who secretly wants to kill or convert all gays.

That’s not to say the Left doesn’t believe in no consequences. If you are a Leftist or a recovering Leftist like yours truly, the greatest sin you can commit is to walk away with no intention of returning to the fold. Once you do that, the consequences of your betrayal are you become a non-person, which opens you up to all the hatred, vitriol, and scorn the Left can heap upon you. But, if you are a Republican/conservative who embraces Leftist ideology, any past sins against the Left are wiped clean. Think of it as Social Justice Warrior Jesus (and, believe me, there are plenty of Leftists who think Jesus was one of them).

The problem with this approach is it doesn’t remove the hypocrisy. Just because you choose not to acknowledge the double standard doesn’t mean there aren’t two standards right in front of your face. If you think your ideology gives you the moral authority to pick and choose what consequences for bad behavior are allowed, you are missing the point about consequences. They aren’t handed out like pieces of candy to good girls and boys; they affect everyone. Oddly enough, the Church used to have a similar approach to salvation called indulgences, where people who wanted to make sure their departed loved ones got into Heaven by filling the Church’s coffers.

Actually, I take that back. Indulgences were far less scummy than the Left’s hypocrisy here.

No matter how much the Left wants to ignore bad behavior on their side and hype bad behavior on the other side, it is up to us to call out the double standard. And it is also up to us to call out bad behavior on our side. If a Trump supporter does something reprehensible, it is our responsibility to hold him or her accountable and not rely on the Left’s hypocrisy as justification. That way, we can claim the moral high ground while at the same time exposing the Left’s double standard. Hold them up to the standards they want to hold us to and watch them squirm.

Then again, any side that had a literal Klan member in their midst who they ignore and/or justify might not have a leg to stand on when it comes to Kyle Kashuv.

Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

41 Views

This year marks the 30th anniversary of my graduation from high school. I’m not sure if there will be a reunion (or if I’ll even be invited after the last reunion where I got arrested streaking through the restaurant…no, wait, that happened last Tuesday), but one thing I do know for sure is school has changed a lot from when I was a student. One area that has changed the most is bullying. Back in my day, I was bullied by some of my peers for being a geek, but not to the level we’re seeing today from peers and adults.

The recent shooting in Parkland, Florida, has brought out bullies from both sides, but it seems the standards for calling it out are vastly different. We’re told not to lash out at students like David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez for expressing their opinions (in favor of taking away people’s guns because fee-fees), but some of these same people lash out at students like Kyle Kashuv for expressing their opinions (in favor of allowing people to keep guns because they didn’t shoot anybody). But what constitutes bullying?

Glad you asked because otherwise this was going to be a boring edition of the Leftist Lexicon. Although we’ve already explored this topic previously,  recent events involving the school shooting survivors merit a revisit.

bullying

What the Left thinks it means – attacking, insulting, or harassing people weaker than you

What it really means – insulting a Leftist’s sensibilities, even if he or she wasn’t the target (does not apply to non-Leftists)

The Left’s view on bullying really relies on its perception of itself as perpetual victims. After all, if you’re a victim of The Man, nothing is ever your fault. The wage gap? It’s because of rich white men wanting to keep women down. Racism? Rich white men wanting to keep people of color down. Stubbed your toe on your bedpost? Rich white men wanting to kill you! Okay, I made that last one up, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not something that’s crossed Leftists’ minds at one point or another.

As you can see, the Left sees rich white men as the eternal victimizers, which might explain why they hate Donald Trump so much, but that’s a blog entry for a different time. When put into this power dynamic, anyone who pushes back against the Leftist narrative, they become rich white men. (If that’s true, I think I’ve been missing a few payments from the Rich White Men League.) In the Leftist mindset, that makes it perfectly fine to bully those who aren’t like them while making it a mortal sin to bully those who are.

As I’ve said more than a few times, the Left isn’t known for logical consistency.

Of course, the threshold for what the Left considers bullying is lower than a centipede’s heels. I will be the first to admit there are some asshats out there who have made some vile comments towards David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez, and their ideological peers because a) I’ve seen some of them, and b) politics has become a mean, ugly thing. Need proof? Just look at what Hogg, Gonzalez, and their ideological peers have called the NRA. Having said that, most of what is being called bullying by the Left is…tame. Mennonites telling “Yo Mama” jokes are harsher than most of the comments directed at the March For Our Lives crowd.

On the other side of the spectrum, check out all the vitriol lobbed at one of Hogg and Gonzalez’s classmates, Kyle Kashuv. Within the past week or so, Kashuv has been subjected to allegations he’s mentally unstable levied by Kurt Eichenwald (who I believe actually is mentally unstable judging from his Twitter feed), an attack on Kashuv and his prom date by senior advisor to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (only to have this same person accuse Kashuv’s supporters of bullying her after she bullied his date and him), and had to endure the Second Amendment dumbassery of Piers Morgan in a Twitter exchange and on “Good Morning Britain”. And that’s on top of the usual vitriol Kashuv gets directly and indirectly from the Left. And, as you might expect, the ratio of good people to asshats is inverse to what Hogg, Gonzalez, and the other Marchers have.

But here’s the thing: the asshats are the bullies, regardless of their political affiliation. I freely admit I am on Kashuv’s side of the gun control debate, but I don’t seek out gun control advocates on his behalf to browbeat them with constant banter. That doesn’t solve the problem. Hogg, Gonzalez, and others like them may have bad intentions with guns, but that doesn’t give us the moral authority to paint them as pure evil. That makes us no better than the Leftists going after Kashuv, and it will perpetuate the bullying problem we continue to see in schools today. And remember this. The Parkland shooter was bullied before he decided to shoot students at the school. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if someone had stood up to the bullies and befriended the shooter.

And this isn’t limited to the students. Adults need to take a step back and lead by example. Sure, you may think David Hogg is as slimier than Kurt Eichenwald’s ideal first date, but haranguing him or his fellow students on the gun control side won’t make him change his mind. That comes with time, patience, and understanding. The same goes for adults who think Kyle Kashuv is an NRA puppet. If you want to change his mind, present the argument with respect and let the chips fall where they may. And for the love of Pete, don’t go personal against either side. Remember each one of these students, pro and anti gun control, have gone through a horrific event and will not react the same way to the aftermath. And the fact they’re all teenagers yet means we need to cut them a bit of slack. I remember how I was when I was their age and I was a dumbass.

Above all else, instead of marching for lives, march up to someone being bullied and stand up to the bullies. Sometimes all it takes is an open hand extended in friendship to open a heart and change a life. And to borrow a Leftist phrase, if it saves even one life…

Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

47 Views

Out of the tragedy of the Parkland, Florida, school shootings has come a hashtag (#NeverAgain) and renewed calls for gun control. However, it has also created potential leaders in members of the student body. On the pro-gun control side, students David Hogg, Cameron Kasky, and Emma Gonzalez have been treated to media interviews, town hall meetings, and other high profile events where their voices have been amplified.

Then, on the pro-Second Amendment side, there’s Kyle Kashuv. He’s visited the White House, spoken to numbers members of Congress, and engaged people of all stripes on Twitter.

But this week’s edition of the Leftist Lexicon isn’t about gun control; it’s about public education. The same school produced Hogg, Kasky, Gonzalez, and Kashuv, but they have radically different viewpoints, and it may be because of the current state of public education.

public education

What the Left thinks it means – a system that teaches children the fundamentals necessary to become informed citizens

What it really means – a Leftist indoctrination factory where the fundamentals are barely taught

By way of full disclosure, I am a public school graduate, as are the members of my family. However, even back when I was roaming the hallways of my high school wondering why cute girls thought I was a nerd (maybe cause, well, I was one), I noticed standards were slipping a bit. Sure, I had some of the same teachers my older brothers did, but it was still noticeable.

Seeing some of the high school students today, I’m pretty sure standards have slipped more than a con artist who makes a living filing bodily injury claims. And it’s not because the students today are lacking access to technology or Internet coverage. You’d be hard-pressed to find a student without a smartphone attached to their bodies in some fashion, and they use hashtags, emojis, and other online forms of communication better than they can speak or write their native language.

Some would say the teachers are to blame, and to some extent, they’ve earned it. Outside of your parents and family, teachers represent most of the adults kids get to know. That’s a pretty big responsibility. You are shaping the minds of young people who will lead this country in the future.

And many of the people with that responsibility seem to think it’s vital to indoctrinate the next generation. After all, we don’t want them growing up thinking government isn’t the greatest thing since sliced bread, right? Now, imagine year after year of being told the Left is right and the Right is wrong. By the time students graduate high school today, they may have been exposed to somewhere in the neighborhood of 13-14 years of Leftist propaganda. And that indoctrination will continue into college where you’re more likely to find a unicorn that farts rainbows than you are a conservative teacher in a prominent position.

A large part of this has to do with teachers unions. Like with most other labor unions, teachers unions tend to be Leftist politically, which means it becomes another way for Leftists to launder federal tax dollars (i.e. our money) through public education, which go right back to the politicians who gave them the money in the first place. Combine that with the number of tenure jockeys out there who lost the passion to teach a long time ago, how schools are desperate enough to hire any teacher who can breathe, and how it practically takes an act of God to get a teacher fired and you have yourself a situation that screams “perfect job for a Leftist.”

Of course, if you’re a Leftist parent, you see nothing wrong with this. But for some of us who would like to get a fast food order filled right the third time, let alone the first, it’s not ideal. That’s why homeschooling, private schools, and school vouchers have gotten so popular in the past couple of decades. And this is why public school advocates and teachers unions like the National Education Association have been working so hard to derail the exodus away from their gravy train. Fewer public school students means less money going to public schools and less power in the political realm.

Look at how the Left has demonized Betsy DeVos, the current Secretary of Education. They say she bought her way into the position (more than likely true), hasn’t set foot in a public school so she isn’t qualified to be Secretary of Education (actually, that sounds more like a selling point than a point of criticism), and she wants to promote homeschooling over public schooling (again, more of a selling point). Having seen DeVos in action, you can make an argument that she isn’t the best person for the job, but to say she’s the spawn of Satan for wanting to improve public education is a bit much. For all we know, she might only be a second cousin to Satan.

Just kidding, Secretary DeVos.

With public education, anyone wanting to make a difference or to improve the overall quality is fighting an uphill battle, one that discourages more people than encourages them. But all is not lost. It is possible to educate a child caught in the public school system, but it takes work. If you can’t afford to send your child to a public school or to homeschool, you need to be  attentive to what your children are learning and show an active interest in it. If you see something you’re not comfortable with what your child is learning, ask questions and balance the lessons with information you’re more comfortable with. Don’t forget education isn’t about spouting what a teacher says; it’s about exposing your children to multiple sources of information so they can learn and grow. An educated student is the bane of public education because he or she will have the tools to make up his or her mind on his or her own. (If I say his or her one more time in this piece, I get a free sandwich. And there it is!)

Not every public school teacher is horrible, but enough are that we need to take a serious look at the public school system to make sure we are getting the best results we with the money being spent. Although I may not agree with the David Hoggs of the world, the fact he is speaking up is admirable and shows his teachers did a good job. The same can be said of the Kyle Kashuvs of the world. If we had more students like these and fewer students who can name more Kardashians than Supreme Court Justices, the world might wind up a better place.

Of course, you realize this means we’re doomed.