More stupid Memes

97 Views

I see memes and other postings across social media that shows just how ignorant the followers of the Left are when it comes to historical facts and it just makes me want to scream. But it also gives me plenty of opportunity to make a blog post about it and ridicule them.

Generally these false history topic memes and postings are similar to the one below. If it were a bucket it would be without a bottom.

It’s supposed to be about the President Trump’s Tweet against the 4 American hating freshmen members of Congress. You can read more about that false witness here: http://www.bynw.com/president-trump-not-a-racist/

But this meme shows the President on one side with the caption “Go back to where you came from!” Which was the President’s advise to those members of Congress that hate everything about the nation they were elected to serve.

And on the other side of the graphic is an old black and white photo of an American Indian in traditional tribal dress. This has the caption of “So when are you leaving?

Well the President isn’t leaving because he doesn’t hate this nation. That is the reason he told those 4 members of Congress to leave. Context is important to understand what something is about.

And the President comes from New York. When he does leave office in 2024 that is where he will go back to living.

Historically, the American Indian tribes lost the land and are entitled to nothing. They are a conquered people and lost everything under the Right of Conquest. Ownership was changed. Adapt, perish, or war for it back are the only options available.

And to be fair their ancestors, just like the President’s, migrated to this land. Both legally I might add. The American Indian’s warred against other tribes and took their land and spoils of war. It’s simple history.

And A Child Shall Lead. Be Afraid.

102 Views

Every so often, an idea will come to a person and it shapes his or her life forever. This is how great inventions, philosophies, and new types of porn get developed. But sometimes the idea leads to darker discoveries, such as cults, violent revolution, and new types of porn.

I had one of these ideas recently, and it doesn’t bode well for the world. The current political landscape is more tattered than pair of cutoffs in a CAT 5 hurricane near a knife factory. People are sniping at each other online and attacking each other in public over differences of opinion. Any middle ground is most likely found at the bottom of a deep chasm between the two sides of an argument.

I got into an online discussion (and by discussion I mean one-sided shouting match with yours truly being the recipient) about Megan Rapinoe and her letting the American flag fall to the ground. I stated my objection to Ms. Rapinoe on this basis and Leftists on the thread thought I was advocating kicking a puppy for fun and profit. Through use of logical fallacies, projecting what they thought I was saying and what my ideological bent was, and a combination of public shaming, vulgarity, and insults, I eventually gave up trying to use reason because it didn’t work the first few times I tried it while correcting and pointing out their logical and factual errors.

Then, it occurred to me the chasm between the Leftists on the thread and me had nothing to do with Left vs. Right, Democrat vs. Republican, Liberals vs. Conservatives, or even Right vs. Wrong. It’s turned into children vs. adults.

The news is full of stories that bear out this observation. Take the recent controversy over Erica Thomas, a Georgia State representative who got chewed out at a Publix grocery store for taking 15 items into the 10 Items or Less lane. (Yes, grammar fans, I know it should be 10 Items or Fewer, but work with me here.) Afterwards, Thomas went to Twitter (the home of online twits) and accused the man who called her out on her lack of grocery etiquette of being racist. She would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn’t been for those pesky kids…or the guy who Thomas called a racist appearing at a press conference Thomas called to talk about the incident. Since then, Thomas has backtracked, doubled down on her original statements, got the police involved, and watched as her public status took a nosedive faster than a Eric Swalwell’s Presidential hopes.

Now, we can debate the importance of what prompted the verbal altercation until the cows come home, but the larger point is Thomas felt she could get away with it because of who she is. And hopefully soon who she was after she resigns by choice or by demand.

What does this have to do with children vs. adults exactly? Maturity. As immature as it is to verbally accost someone in a supermarket over the number of items in a cart or basket, it’s just as immature to assume you have the authority to do it because you want to do it. Children are some of the most ego-centric people in society (second only to Congresscritters). Everything they do is designed to advance their own self-interest, and when they are denied what they want, their natural instinct is to get emotional and/or make excuses for their behavior.

Remind you of anyone you know, Ms. Thomas?

If this were an isolated incident, we might be okay, but it’s not. If you look around at the stories big and small, I’ll bet you can find more than a few instances of the adults vs. children mindset. Prepubescent drag queens, the Fight for $15 movement, Antifa and its media supporters, Megan Rapinoe and the American flag, Colin Kaepernick and the Betsy Ross Nikes, boycotts of conservative (or seemingly conservative) businesses for not towing the Leftist line, deplatforming speakers, doxing known opponents to Leftist causes, people confronting conservative members of Congress and the Trump Administration, and many, many more, all of which boils down to adults vs. children.

So, how do we fix this? I’m not sure we can anymore. We may have passed the point of no return, thus guaranteeing this is a one-way trip. The best advice I can give is to act like adults, regardless of where you fall on the ideological spectrum, because the appeal of being free from responsibility while maintaining an unwavering belief that our word and feelings are law is very strong. Like the Leftists in the online discussion about Megan Rapinoe, the children need to gang up on you so you relent, but that doesn’t mean you have to, especially when it’s something that is clearly wrong. No matter how often they badger you or tell you that you’re wrong, know that they are trying to appeal to your need to be part of a group, to be accepted. Trust me, being accepted into some groups is worse than being alone.

In the meantime, we have to be careful because we’re not dealing with rational, mature people most of the time. We are dealing with people whose entire worldviews are predicated on the notion that all men and women are created equally inferior to them, and they will get nasty. They need you to take the bait so they can drag you down to their level where they have the home field advantage. But not every battle needs to be waged online, in public, or in private. Just know the children are running the asylum right now, so we need to be careful. There is a reason so many Leftists were shocked at the 2016 Presidential election, and it’s because there were a lot of Trump supporters who silently listened to the rhetoric and decided to pull the lever for Donald Trump. And with the Left acting more and more childish by the day, 2020 is starting to shape up to be another pity party for the Left.

Robert Mueller, Redefined

95 Views

Today, the House Judiciary Committee had former Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller up to Capitol Hill to testify about his investigation into whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice. At least, that’s what it was billed as, but in actuality it was closer to a live action recreation of the Hindenburg, but without the humor.

During the testimony, we saw a different side of Mueller. What was once the beacon of truth, justice, and the American Way was seen as weak, incompetent, and otherwise spent after 2-plus years of investigating the same issue and coming up as close to empty as you can get without delving into Rep. Ted Lieu’s self-awareness territory. Although both sides are doing their best to spin the testimony in a way that exonerates/condemns the President, I saw something else.

I saw someone used by the Left for their own benefit without concern about the implications.

For those of you jumping to the conclusion I’m about to go off on a long diatribe about Mueller’s honor and service to this country as a means to defend him, relax for a minute. My internal jury is still out on whether he’s as honorable as advertised or if he was in on the Trump-Russia delusion from the jump. What I do know is he isn’t the confident man we saw early on in this bad political telenovela. Today, we saw him, human and flawed.

Leftists are notorious for latching onto a personality that can be used for partisan purposes, using said personality, and then dropping him or her when the political benefits have run their course. Remember Cindy Sheehan? She was the David Hogg of the first George W. Bush term. You couldn’t swing a dead cat (and, really, why would you) without hearing about her. Then, as soon as she challenged Nancy Pelosi for her House seat, Sheehan became persona non grata. The same can be said of Valerie Plame, Joe Wilson (husband of the aforementioned CIA Barbie), James and Susan MacDougal, Walter Mondale, and countless others.

And I get the feeling Mueller is the latest addition to that list.

The Left used him in a two-fold manner. First, they relied on his military career and past to try to diffuse any criticisms about his duties as Special Prosecutor. They also pointed out he was a Republican, which means as much to me as what color hair he had as a boy. Through these tactics, the Left set up what they consider to be a perfect shield against criticism. However, it’s not. It’s actually a logical fallacy called Appeal to Authority, which, in short, is when someone tries to refute a point by pointing at someone’s stature, regardless of whether it has any bearing on the subject at hand. (See global climate change for a great example of this.) It’s great that Mueller served in the Marine Corps and spent years serving the country, but neither one disqualifies him from criticism when he did a bad job. Judging from his performance on Capitol Hill today, Mueller should be ready to get an earful.

Through the Appeal to Authority, Leftists elevated Mueller to god level and knew he would find something on which to charge President Trump. When the Mueller Report was about to come out and it didn’t appear as though it was going to net anything juicy, the Left downgraded their expectations to retain their adoration, which lead to today’s disastrous hearing that did more damage to the Left and Mueller than it did to the Trump Administration.

Soon, the Left will use Mueller in a second manner, that of a scapegoat. In a Leftist’s mind, nothing is ever his or her fault. It’s always the work of some devious forces working against him/her. The focus of the seemingly failed Trump impeachment is bound to switch from Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats to Mueller, if for no other reason than because he failed to get Trump impeached. And that’s a failure the Left cannot let stand under any circumstances.

If you’re reading this, Mr. Mueller, know the long knives may be coming out for you very soon from people who held you in high esteem until you couldn’t deliver on their partisan fantasies. It’s nothing personal against you…okay, they’ll make it personal because you hurt their feelings by not finding anything for which to charge their Public Enemy #1. And the sad part is you were either an unwitting dupe or a willing participant, neither of which will help you escape this trap of your own making, at least in part.

And that may be the most puzzling part of all this. If you were an unwitting dupe, how can we trust your judgment and findings in light of this? (And from where I sit, your testimony today did you no favors in trying to dissuade people from seeing you as a dupe.) And if you were a willing participant, you lied or let others lie on your behalf by omission, which taints the results of your investigation and ruins your credibility even worse than your testimony today did. In either case, you might want to lie low as soon as you can and hope someone else ruins his or her credibility with all the grace of a belly flop into a hotel pool at spring break.

But don’t worry. With all the clowns in Washington DC who ran this Impeachment-Palooza dud, I’m sure someone will supplant you in no time!

Another Nonsense Leftist Meme

119 Views

It’s time once again to tear apart a Leftist meme and show it the light of reality. So we have this gem I pulled off of FascistBook.

Let’s dive in and look at each point. One by one.

Medicare for All – This doesn’t even sound good. Medicare doesn’t work very well for the people that it is currently supporting. Many doctors don’t accept Medicare since it doesn’t pay the bills. And the Left wants this forced on everyone. But I doubt @AOC will be using it for her private medical care.

A Living Wage – This is a nonsense Leftist buzzword. It means nothing. Look at what has already happened in cities that have forced the $15 per hour wage on all businesses. Some smaller business have closed down because they can’t afford to pay the wage and insurance for its employees. Unskilled workers have found they make too much money and don’t qualify for other government assistance programs. So those employees cut their own hours. Larger corporations simply cut hours and hire more workers as its cheaper to pay a lot a little than a little a lot. Or they replace workers with self-checkouts and automated kiosks.

The answer to this one is simple. If you want to make more money, and who doesn’t. Learn a valuable skill. Even Bernie Sanders isn’t paying his campaign staffers this wage.

Labor Rights – What do you mean by this term? I live in a Right to Work state. That means I’m not forced to join a union in order to be employed. That means I can terminate my employment at any time for any reason with my employer. And right now it’s an employee’s market thanks to the Trump Administration. Those are great Labor Rights in my book.

K-16 schooling, aka Public Colleges – I’m going to assume here that @AOC and her Leftist radicals mean free, no cost education. We don’t need more government involvement in education, we need less. We also need to get rid of the notion that a college education is mandatory for everyone. It’s not. My mom always used to say that the education system was terrible when she was in school and it was only getting worse with each generation that followed.

As a side note many of these points of “free” things like Medicare for All, Education, and a host of other radical ideas from the Left all require money. They aren’t free. In the education system alone it takes money to have the land, build and maintain a school building, buy all of the materials that teachers and other staff members need to do their jobs, pay all the staff from janitorial, cooks, teachers, coaches, secretaries, and administration staff. And if @AOC did it, they would all be getting at least $15/hour. That’s a lot of money.

It just goes to show that the Leftist followers aren’t thinking. Money has to be made in order to spend it on these programs. And the government doesn’t make anything it can sell and create money with at all. The government gets money from taxes, taking money from someone else.

100% Renewable Energy – I’m going to assume here again that this means all “green” energy like solar and wind energy. But not coal, oil, gas, kerosene, and other related energy sources. And probably not nuclear either as the Left likes to think that Three mile island, Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters will happen to all nuclear plants one day. I have yet to see any of these “green” energy fanatics adopt pure “green” energy for themselves. Not even the poster child Al Gore. The Leftist elite will still use oil but the common people will not under the new green deal.

And of course there is the myth that oil is not a renewable energy source. This has been debunked by Soviet scientists decades ago. Another bit of science ignored by the Left because it doesn’t fit their ideology.

Fixing the Pipes in Flint – What? The Federal government has no business in Flint. Flint needs to fix their pipes. Or Flint should be abandoned. Many towns have been abandoned due to governmental failures at the local level. Flint shouldn’t be an exception. Let it become a ghost town like Centralia PA. Nothing is too big to fail.

Not hurting Immigrants – What? This is an attempt to appeal to one’s emotions instead of thinking logically. This is a dangerous thing to do. Try it for yourself. Act only on your emotions and see where it gets you. Say what you mean or say nothing at all. Stop the ignorance.

Holding Wall Street Accountable – What? This is pulled right out of the millionaire Bernie Sander’s playbook. One of his buzz words. It like the one above is an emotional appeal. Stop being an ignorant fool and say what you mean. Articulate your thoughts. Then we can have a discussion about it.

Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

80 Views

Sometimes politics make for strange bedfellows, and other times it makes for “no duh” bedfellows. The Left’s Congressional Freshman phenoms fall into the latter group. Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley and their supporters are calling themselves “The Squad.” Although they came from different backgrounds, they are united by their politics, positions, and drive to make the country more progressive.

What makes these four women and their followers so special? I’ve been trying to figure that out since the Left made them their de facto leaders/golden children/rock stars. Are they the next generation of leaders or the political equivalent of Pogs? Let’s find out!

The Squad

What the Left thinks it means – four strong female Congresswomen who represent the future and care about the important issues of the day

What it really means – the personification of identity politics

I have a confession to make. I actually do know why The Squad is being held up as the Great Not-White-At-All Hope, and it has nothing to do with what they do or have done. Their appeal to the Left is literally skin deep. The fact they’re women and progressive only adds to their appeal to many. And the fact they’re all vocal opponents to President Donald Trump makes them the greatest thing since sliced bread.

Which begs the question of how great an invention sliced bread is, but that’s the blog post for another time.

As someone who looks for results rather than hype, I did some digging to see what The Squad has accomplished. In terms of legislative accomplishments, let’s just say I tied them and I wasn’t even trying. Outside of the political realm, they’ve created a great brand that people can identify with, especially on social media. Of course, social media isn’t the real world, so their accomplishments are pretty much the same as mine: being opinionated in cyberspace. The differences, though, are I don’t try to pass stupid legislation while I do it and I’m not wasting taxpayer money to do it. Taxpayer time, yes, but not taxpayer money.

The Squad has also been thorns in the side of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (which makes me laugh because of what her party has done to bring about The Squad and how they repay her with openly suggesting she’s a racist). The same Leftists who propped up Pelosi are now ready to throw her under The Squad bus because…she’s not as progressive as The Squad is! (Quick investment tip: buy a LOT of shares in Orville Redenbacher.) Although this kind of behavior is red meat…sorry, white tofu to the Left, it isn’t working very well with the rest of the population. I can’t account for all of them, but from what I’ve read at least half of The Squad are seeing approval ratings lower than the President’s. Not nationally, mind you. In their own districts.

Granted, The Squad may be in districts safely in Leftist hands, so there may not be reason to worry…except if people decide to challenge them from the Right and the Left. So far, there is at least one known challenger to The Squad’s most vocal leader, the aforementioned Rep. Ocasio-Cortez (a.k.a. the Socialist Socialite), and there is enough time before the 2020 elections for more to join the fray. This has the potential to open a wider rift between The Squad and the Not-Leftist-Enough Democrats, who have watched The Squad go from back-benchers to unintended spokespeople for the Democrats. The impending Leftist civil war is going to be interesting to watch, if only because it underscores the pyrrhic nature of the victory they achieved in 2018 in part because of The Squad.

Congratulations, Leftists. You’ve created the means of your own destruction. But unlike in the original (and vastly funnier) “Ghostbusters,” it’s not a giant marshmallow man coming to destroy you; it’s identity politics which you helped to make mainstream.

Of course, anyone who decides The Squad isn’t all that great will get showered with allegations of racism, sexism, Islamophobia, fascism, white supremacy, patriarchy, Nazism, and other invectives that have become the new slang for the Left (along with copious amounts of vulgarity). The issue is none of the legitimate criticisms raised about The Squad have anything to do with any of that. Sure, there are people out there giving as good as they’re getting, but most of us between the Left and the Right see The Squad not as a powerful force for good, but as a group whose watched their expectations drop lower than a snake’s belt buckle because it’s hip to hate President Trump yet manage to limbo underneath these expectations all while standing upright.

I don’t have an issue with Rep. Ilhan’s faith. I have an issue with her possibly breaking the law repeatedly prior to becoming a Representative.

I don’t have an issue with Rep. Tlaib’s faith, either. I have an issue with her ties to Hamas, a known terrorist organization.

I don’t have an issue with Rep. Pressley’s race. I have an issue with her suggesting there are blacks that should be silent on racial issues because they may not agree with her.

I don’t have an issue with Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s gender. I have an issue with her being intellectually and emotionally unsuited to represent herself, let alone her Congressional district.

And collectively, I don’t have an issue with any boxes the members of The Squad can mark off on a checklist. I have an issue with them criticizing others for doing what they do instead of finding a way to bring people together. As the old Spider-Man comics say, “With great power comes great responsibility.” Maybe The Squad prefers DC to Marvel, but the point is they still haven’t grasped the concept of leadership, all while putting themselves out there as leaders. The longer The Squad goes unchecked in the political and communication arenas, the harder it will be to topple them.

And, no, I do not condone violence or threats against these women. Beat them with better arguments, not with your fists. And given some of the stupefying things The Squad has said since taking office, you won’t even have to work that hard!

“What is Ilhan Omar’s endgame”? – Guest piece by Ari Kaufman

277 Views
Coincidentally, my flight landed at Minneapolis-St. Paul airport just as Thursday’s now-infamous and sycophantic Ilhan Omar rally concluded.

The predominantly white and elderly crowd (retired teachers and assorted radicals) of activists I saw held signs with straw man  clichés (“Racism is not patriotic”), accompanied by the usual anti-Trump and anti-GOP rhetoric. There were maybe three dozen people in attendance, not “about 100 supporters mobbing Ms. Omar for a hero’s welcome” as a New York Times story noted. Some folks have jobs, you know. Perhaps even more media was present than attendees.

What exactly were they celebrating, though?

Rep. Omar’s views of the country that fought to save people like her in Somalia, allowed her family to settle here in freedom and, just a few years after graduating from a mediocre state college, jumpstart her national political career, remain ignorant and repugnant. Month after month of divisive and disingenuous venom from the first-term congresswoman deserves all the criticism and opprobrium we can muster.

This week, Omar transitions from making anti-Semitic comments to crafting anti-Semitic policy, when she introduces an offensive resolution supporting the Boycott, Divest, Sanctions (BDS) movement—a rogue anti-Israel organization, supported by Hamas and other execrable global groups, whose actions embody historical examples of Jew-hatred, while inexplicably equating the Jewish State to Nazi Germany in the process.

The invidious resolution is symbolic anti-semitic propaganda that won’t garner public support in a wise nation that, unlike much of the world, overwhelmingly believes the Jewish people have right to exist in their homeland.

Aside from seeking attention and more fundraising opportunities (“follow the Benjamins,” indeed), Omar likely wants to get her fellow Democrats, including 2020 Presidential hopefuls, on the record. This should infuriate those candidates, including fellow Minnesota Democrat, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, currently among the crop of aspirants. Klobuchar happens to be openly pro-Israel, unlike many candidates including purported frontrunners Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

Democrats, who already struggled mightily to condemn Omar’s numerous past abhorrent comments on Israel, Judaism, AIPAC and its “Benjamins” dominating U.S. policy on Israel, hope to delay the legislation amid fears of continued intra-party clashes. Not a bad idea, but sad too. Though Omar is safe in her provincial urban district, it should undoubtedly only alienate more Jews and Minnesotans from what her ilk believes is a “revolution.”

Tellingly, less than a year ago and before her election to Minnesota’s far left 5th Congressional district — ironically the most Jewish district in the state and nearly all the Midwest —  Omar told a crowd of Democrats at Beth El Synagogue that she opposes BDS, a group so bigoted that nearly 30 states have passed legislation banning organizations that support BDS from receiving state funds. The House Foreign Affairs Committee also passed a July 17 resolution accusing BDS of promoting “principles of collective guilt, mass punishment and group isolation.” What changed, Ilhan, or did you lie to placate gullible liberal Jews?

Lee Zeldin, a Jewish Iraq War veteran and congressman of Omar’s age, who has destroyed her since January on social media, tweeted, “Israel is our best ally in the Mid East; a beacon of hope, freedom and liberty, surrounded by existential threats. Shame on Rep Omar for bringing her hateful twist on that reality to House Foreign today, propping up the BDS movement and blaming Israel for all of its challenges.”

So Omar is hurting her party by augmenting the internecine war between liberals and the hard Left, dividing her district, ruining her brand, and giving a president she loathes more foil to expose her. What is her overarching goal?

Perhaps, as debated on Fox News, talk radio and occasionally the legacy media, the power within today’s Democratic Party is not with Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Steny Hoyer and party elders, but with inane “activists” like Omar and her vacuous media allies.

If President Trump wanted to call out the anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism of Omar’s so-called “squad,” there are more effective ways than to say, “go back where you came from”; but absent any check on their instincts, radicals like Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib and other brainwashed young leftists will continue their commitment to, as one writer recently put it, “a special brand of ethnic and sectarian antagonism.”

And that hatred has troubling aspects for Democrats, Republicans, and the United States.

President Trump not a Racist

140 Views

President Trump’s remarks over Twitter toward 4 freshman Congresswomen were not racist. They were cultural in nature.

The 4 members of Congress have been on record stating hateful things about the Republic, about the Exceptionalism of the United States, about the Flag and history. They go out of their way to attack the only true ally the United States has in the middle east.

So President Trump is right when he remarked over Twitter to leave the country. If you hate this country so much please leave it. Do us all the favor. Go to a country that has the form of government you prefer. One that is more in agreement to your own thinking.

There was nothing in that statement that was racist. It applies equally to everyone. And there is only one race of people on this Earth. Humans. And both the President and those 4 members of the freshman class of Congress are of that race.

Hard science has disproven any past claims of “race” based on skin pigmentation or other physical features. That is the truth of the science of genetics.

But the Democratic Party doesn’t believe in real hard science. Only bunk science that agrees with their chosen ideology. And thus the charges of racism against the President.

Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

120 Views

Once again, the US Women’s Soccer Team has won the World Cup. With this win comes the usual fanfare: wall-to-wall coverage of the tournament, puff pieces about the players, parades, media appearances, and the inevitable answer/question on “Jeopardy” in 2+ years before fading away into obscurity. This year is a little bit different, thanks to one of the players, Megan Rapinoe. Even before the team won the World Cup, she came out and said she wouldn’t go to the White House to visit President Donald Trump in part because she doesn’t feel he’s been inclusive to people like her.

Meaning white female soccer players with purple hair? Oh, wait, I forgot Rapinoe is a lesbian because I really don’t care what or who she does when she’s off the field. What she’s doing in refusing a trip to the White House over inclusion is taking a stand Leftists are applauding (because…Orange Man Bad?). But she’s also giving us a topic for a Leftist Lexicon blog!

inclusion

What the Left thinks it means – making sure everyone feels welcomed and comfortable in a social/political environment

What it really means – agreeing with and condoning Leftist behavior under any and all circumstances

Leftists talk the talk when it comes to inclusion. They invent multiple genders (most of them variations on a theme), insist you call people by their preferred pronouns (even if they’re harder to pronounce than Klingon), and talk about “safe spaces” where people can go to be validated for being the way they are. They tell their followers how powerful these differences are and nurture the idea these differences are core to who they are.

Until someone comes along who doesn’t follow Leftist dogma. Then, the Left’s inclusion talk goes the way of Eric Swalwell’s Presidential campaign. Now, I’m not saying the Right doesn’t do this, but it’s been my experience the Left is faster to the banhammer than the Right is over what amounts to a miniscule deviation from the ideological playbook. The purpose of this hardline approach is simple: the Left needs to keep its talking points straight, and any difference of opinion endangers that.

The funny (and by funny I mean weird) part is how willing the Left is to embrace inclusion the further left you skew. Today, the Left celebrates prepubescent drag queens who aren’t even old enough to get pimples, let alone wear pumps and feather boas. Tomorrow, the line will get shifted further leftward, and the Left will rally for more inclusion. But it’s not just inclusion they’re looking for; it’s normalization. Once something is seen as normal to average Americans, the controversy that preceded it falls away. Then, people can frame those who still see the controversy as backwards…with the help of our Leftist friends in the media. After all, if our neighbors think an 11 year old drag queen is fine, why shouldn’t we?

This is what is known in logical fallacy circles as an appeal to popularity, with a little appeal to authority mixed in for good measure. The Left has a stake in creating what they consider an inclusive environment because it helps solidify their political power and coerces people into agreeing with their ideas out of fear of ridicule, or in the case of Antifa, physical violence.

Not an inclusive position, don’t you think?

The funny (and by funny I mean funny, yet fitting) part is the Right already does what the Left claims they want. With only a handful of exceptions, most conservatives are easy-going and are willing to accept anyone into their groups, even if these folks disagree with them. They enjoy discussing issues and ideas with passion and purpose and they typically don’t end friendships or cut ties with family members over political disagreements. I probably shouldn’t do this, but I happen to have the super secret Conservative Inclusivity Plan which I will share with you now.

1) Be friendly
2) Find common ground with each other
3) Don’t let the differences spoil the commonalities
4) Grill meat of some fashion

Okay, so I added that last part under direction from some friends of mine in Texas, but the point remains clear. Inclusion isn’t and should never be about indoctrination or conforming to an idea or cause. Inclusion requires, well, including people. If you follow the #WalkAway movement online, you will see account after account, testimony after testimony, of people who have been welcomed, even if they don’t plan to vote for Donald Trump because it’s not about Trump. It’s about finding that place where you feel like you belong without fear of running afoul of the unwritten codes of a particular group.

Although Rapinoe’s message is the right one, she was the wrong person to be the messenger for it because she has shown her notion of inclusion is rather exclusive to those who agree with her. And here’s the kicker, if you’ll pardon the pun. On the whole, Donald Trump has been more inclusive with his Cabinet picks and staff than people realize. After all, Trump is the first President in our history to have been in favor of gay marriage from the outset of his Presidency.

And who was the candidate who said repeatedly marriage was between a man and a woman? Hillary Clinton.

Sorry, Megan. Looks like you just scored an ideological own-goal here. Or two.

Leftist Lexicon Word of the Week

136 Views

The recent Antifa attack on Andy Ngo has opened up a number of interesting questions. Is violence necessary to bring about political and societal change? What responsibility do the police have to protect people? How many Antifa members still live at home with Mommy and Daddy?

One of the more intriguing questions is what constitutes a journalist. Leftists can’t seem to define what a journalist is in this case, but they know for sure Ngo isn’t one of them. According to them, he’s a hack, little more than a provocateur for a radical alt-right website who defends Nazis and President Donald Trump. Instead, they think people like Jim Acosta are “real journalists” when he’s little more than a provocateur with a CNN press pass. (Actually, I take that back. It’s far too insulting to compare Ngo to Acosta, so I apologize…to Andy Ngo.)

So, let’s take a moment to delve into what a journalist is…and isn’t.

journalist

What the Left thinks it means – a hard working person charged with the task of revealing the truth

What it really means – an overworked individual charged with the task of revealing the truth, even if his or her colleagues don’t agree with it

As a former/recovering journalism student, I have my own perspective on what constitutes a journalist today, but I will save my thoughts on the term for later. Right now, I want to get at the Left’s concept of journalists and journalism in general. And it starts with a favorite phrase of theirs: “Facts have a liberal bias.” The Left believes they always have the high ground when it comes to factual discussions, so naturally they treat any reporting that supports their ideology or personal biases as the truth. Granted, we all do that to some extent, but this is confirmation bias on steroids.

Remember that old chestnut that 97% of climate scientists agree with the hypothesis of manmade climate change? The Left throws that out like candy at a parade run by the National Tooth Decay Association. Yet, when you dig a little deeper, you find the 97% is just a little overinflated by…oh, I don’t know…a factor of two. Going from almost certainty to a coin flip should take the steam out of the argument, but it doesn’t to the Left. They repeat the debunked 97% claim as though they get paid by George Soros to do it. Then again…

Anyway, the point is the Left is perfectly willing to ignore, cherry-pick, or out and out deny facts if they clash with their ideology and talking points. Apply that same logic to the news, and you have the Left’s approach to journalists and journalism. That’s why you’ll hear Leftists continue to bow at the altar of Dan Rather as a credible reporter/commentator in spite of the fact he and some of his CBS cohorts got fired for…making up a news story out of whole cloth in an attempt to discredit and possibly defeat George W. Bush in 2004. It’s also why the Left champions the cause of people like Jim Acosta, who is little more than a pimple on the late Edward R. Murrow’s ass.

By now, you might have noticed a trend. Leftists’ positive examples of journalists tend to be…Leftists themselves! Why, that’s…completely expected! In reality, Leftist news sources merely reinforce what Leftists already believe because they never take off their ideological blinders to see else is going on out there. They still can’t figure out how Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton even though the facts are right in front of them.

Ahhhhhh! I think we’re onto something here! To borrow a line from Ben Shapiro, “Facts don’t care about your feelings.” The Left thrives on emotions, and their truths are deeply rooted in what they feel to be true. Hmmm…I swear I’ve heard that articulated by a Leftist darling of recent memory, but I can’t remember exactly who…oh well. Good thing she’s not a Congresswoman who represents a district in New York City or anything because that would be really embarrassing, right?

Speaking of embarrassing, the modern journalist falls into one of two categories: Leftist stenographer, or relatively unknown person who has a nose for digging up truths, no matter where they are. While the former get awards and recognition for merely repeating the tired refrain Orange Man Bad, the latter rarely get noticed until they find themselves within the stories they cover, as Andy Ngo did. Then, the “real journalists” come out in droves to mock and/or discredit the real journalists for daring to do what they do (at least in their opinion). In truth, the latter group is doing what the former group used to do and fail to do now.

It’s been said there is more real journalism going on in cyberspace than there is in editorial boardrooms across the country, and I tend to agree. What passes for journalism today wouldn’t have gotten past my Journalism 101 professor’s desk without being returned with a failing grade and a request to rethink journalism as a profession. Regardless of who is putting in the legwork and where their work is getting published, the derided reporters are the ones carrying the torch for the profession, not the perfectly quaffed talking airhead who makes Ron Burgundy look like a MENSA candidate. For the Jim Acostas of the world, hitting a beat means having to walk to get to the open bar at a party. And for those of the current journalism field offended that I am taking their jobs less seriously than a paper on atomic energy written by Cardi B, suck it up because you have been doing the journalism profession a grave disservice for decades, and to claim you’re on par with firefighters and are in danger because President Trump says mean things about you is the height of narcissistic cluelessness. Andy Ngo had to go to the hospital because he dared do what you Brooks Brothers-clad bores wouldn’t do: report on actual news as it was happening at risk to his own life to cover Antifa after they targeted him.

You know, I really need to learn how to open up a bit more on certain subjects. I hold back too much.

Seriously, I don’t envy those who hold true to the principles of good journalism. Not only do you have the usual grind of fleshing out stories, building trust in sources, and finding good leads and story ideas, but you have people who wouldn’t last 10 minutes on a beat telling you that your work isn’t journalism because they say so. And those of you who are out there in the field risking life and limb on top of all that? Nothing but respect.

The sign of a real journalist is not what they report and how it’s reported, but what they don’t report or deem as newsworthy. The fact the “real journalists” haven’t bothered to do even a little research on Antifa being violent Leftist thugs should tell you loads about how disconnected they are to reality.

And that should tell you everything you need to know about their judgment on what real journalism is and who is doing it.

Something Important?

127 Views

The Pro-Choice movement has gotten us to this point in history where we must tell parents to put “something important” in the backseat of cars to make sure they remember that their child is in the car. We, as a society, are more focused on preventing an animal from dying in a hot car in the summer time but forget about our own children. What could be more important than a child?

But it is due to the Pro-Choice movement that we have this culture of death when it comes to children. We are numb to it. Innocent children are ripped from their mother’s wombs at any point and even some states now have abortion laws that allow a child to be aborted at birth. It really comes as no surprise that parents don’t recognize the importance of their own children or any child with a mindset that we have had since the Courts forced this situation on us and no one has told the Courts that they cannot make law.

This meme just angers me to no end. Any parent who would “forget” that their child was in a hot car should be charged with murder and go to prison for life and have them sterilized as well. Put them in general population as a known child killer and let the other inmates sort it out.