Obama Family Revelations

I recently ran across a snippet of a CNN street interview of the late Joan Rivers. She was of course known for comedic style from the Tonight Show.

Joan was very outspoken in her Liberal Leftist political agenda, a huge backer of Obama’s bid to become President. And a friend of the LGBT communities.

In case there are any doubts to the content. I have linked the video below. And in case the Leftist controlled social media sites ever take it down. I have it downloaded and preserved.

Joan Rivers had become a minister in the Universal Life Church. She had recently conducted a same-sex “marriage” at a Barnes and Noble while promoting her last book. This is when the CNN reporter caught up with her and began to ask her questions.

One was if Ms Rivers was going to become a celebrity wedding minister as a carrier move. To which she replied that she doesn’t charge to do weddings. Another question was if Ms Rivers ever thought that the country would have a gay president.

Joan Rivers promptly answered that we already had a gay president in Obama. And further stated that his wife, Michelle, was actually a transgender. Born a man, but reassigned to be a female.

The media and other places that talk about this at all state that it’s just Joan Rivers comedic style to say something outlandish. But there are other sites and sources that state the same thing if one goes digging around for them. Especially during the height of 2012 re-election bid.

At the time they were dismissed as right-wing conspiracy theory nut jobs. But they should be revisited. And Michelle Obama should submit to an independent blood test.

A simple chromosomal pairing will prove or disprove the theory in an instant. She will either have an XX pair and be female or she wont.

Of course if this is true and if it was known, Barack Obama would have never been elected president in 2008 to begin with and never would have had a re-election in 2012.

 

Pro-Life or Pro-Choice

Lets look at abortion, this is going to be a big topic in the coming months as new pro-life laws are challenged in the Supreme Court. Especially since Justice Kavanaugh will be on the court to hear these cases.

I’m not going to go into the fact that the Court doesn’t Constitutionally have this power of review, since that is a topic for another post. And they think they do and We the People do nothing and let them have it.

The pro-choice side states that life begins when a baby is born. That a developing fetus is part of the mother and is just a mass of cells. No different from any others of her body. And that a woman can do anything with her own body and we, meaning the legislature I presume, cannot make any laws against what a woman can do with her own body.

If I don’t have that correct please let me know, politely, in the comments. As a reminder personal attacks in the comments will not be approved. And the user may be banned from this site in the future. Thank you.

The pro-life side states that life begins at conception. We do not equate the egg and sperm as a baby. They must unite in the spark of light for a baby to be conceived. Only the resulting union is a new life. The developing fetus in the mother’s womb is a separate individual. It is not a mass of cells any more than the mother herself is a mass of cells. Just the fetus cannot exist outside of the womb until it is fully developed.

It is a false argument to state that the legislature cannot make laws against what a woman, or a man for that matter, cannot do with their bodies. There are a multitude of such laws already in existence. It is illegal to be a prostitute. It is illegal to use the services of a prostitute. It is illegal to consume certain drugs before a specific age. It is illegal to consume certain drugs for any reason or condition. These are just the easy ones. Each of these restrict what a woman can do with her body. Where is the outrage?

Additionally we already have common law examples that a developing fetus is a separate human life. This is proven time and time again when a pregnant woman is murdered. The perpetrator is charged with TWO counts of murder. One for the mother. And one for the unborn child developing in her womb. If that developing fetus was just a mass of cells and part of the mother, there wouldn’t be two counts of murder, there would be only one charge and not two.

So here is where the pro-choice argument fails and shows that it is a matter of convenience and not a matter of truth. Because truth would show that either a developing fetus is either a mass of cells or it another human life. It cannot be both. Either the murderer is charged with 2 counts and abortion is a murder. Or the murderer is only charged with 1 count and abortion is just the removal of an unwanted cellular tissue mass, like cancer.

To be pro-choice is either grossly neive and confused. Or one is mentally ill or just purely wicked and evil.

 

Social Media Evolution

Social media keeps changing. Twitter, Facebook, and others are increasingly hostile to those that express conservative views and even actively suppress them. Google Plus has announced it is sun-setting the consumer (personal) pages. It looks like Facebook has won that war for now. But it’s not over at all.

I think with all the negativity that exists with the Social media giants and their security issues, data breaches and mining concerns, and their ability to limit speech by those with a different political agenda, will be their undoing.

Blogging is on the rise and continues to grow daily. New blogs rise up everywhere on every imaginable topic. And I also think we will see a return to the internet forums as well.

I personally have several of each. And I am a member of several more on top of that. My wife checks different blogs every day on topics that interest her.

Of course the difficult task is finding these blogs and forums that are within your varied interests. Internet searches can give bad results or no results depending on the search engine used and the keywords themselves.

But they do exist. And if they don’t, they can easily be created by someone who wishes to bring it life with their passion. Fortunately technical wizardry is not required to do this in today’s age.

So find us. Join us. Create your own and invite us. Let the word of each be spread far and wide.

Social media is coming to an end.

 

Settled Law

Throughout the course of nearly every single Supreme Court nomination in the past couple of decades has been the topic of “Settled Law”.

This is a wicked and dangerous idea that needs to be eliminated once and for all. Many use this term when it comes to discussing the 1973 Supreme Court opinion on Roe v. Wade that legitimized the serial murder of children within their mother’s wombs. This is not, nor has it ever been, settled law.

There are only ten laws that are settled. Forever unchanging and compleatly irreversible. These laws are found in the Book of Exodus and have the common name of the Ten Commandments. And they can be usually found in every courthouse across this great nation. Rightly and proudly displayed to the public.

These are the only settled laws in all existence.

Every law that man has made is changeable by man at any time. What is illegal today can be legal tomorrow. What is legal today can become illegal just as quickly. This includes the opinion on Roe v. Wade, which isn’t law at all since it is a court opinion.

Many laws are changed, modified, rewritten, ignored, and removed every single year by state legislatures and Congress with a simple vote and then signature of the chief executive.

So take the notion of settled law out of your vocabulary. It doesn’t exist outside of the Laws of God.

 

Congratulations Judge Kavanaugh

I watched the Senate vote on the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Throughout the vote Leftists in the gallery violated Senate rules and interrupted the proceedings several times causing the sergeant-at-arms to restore order.

I think these people should be federally charged, face prosecution with jail time and be forever barred from entering the Senate gallery for life. There is a time and place for such actions but it is not in the Senate gallery.

The outcome of the vote was 50 in favor of confirming the nomination and 48 opposing the nomination. Per the Senate rules, which in this case requires a simple majority, the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States was approved.

 

Lunacy over Kavanaugh

It is absolute lunacy. The Marxists in Congress continue to assault the dignity and reputation of Mr. Kavanaugh. 1st it was an attempted sexual assault in high school. The 2nd allegation was exposing himself at college, and a woman accidentally touching his exposed penis. And now, Mr. Kavanaugh is accused of participating in giving high school girls drugs at parties and gang-rapping them. Come on. Really?

Each of these tales get wilder than the one before it. Of course the Leftist loonies believe that a man who is accused of any sexual misconduct is automatically guilty and must prove his innocence if they want to give him that opportunity. But usually he is guilty and should be removed from society without due process.

But that rule doesn’t apply to those men who are Leftists themselves. Like Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and many members of the Democratic Party in Congress who have settled out of court with their victims and never proclaimed their innocence at all.

Of course come Mr. Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote in the Senate on Friday. There will probably be another allegation brought up against him. Maybe the Leftists will report that Mr. Kavanaugh really is someone else who has done all these things that we thought was in prison or even never caught. Thus making his whole life a lie.

Funny though that in the SIX FBI background investigations that have happened during Mr. Kavanaugh’s political career that NONE of these things have ever been discovered.

 

Round Two of the Fight

Another accuser has come forward. Just in time to prolong the nomination hearing in the Senate Committee or again to stop it in it’s tracks. This is the Left’s goal.

They would rather have the Supreme Court empty than have one more of President Trump’s nominees on it. They will push this issue with Mr. Kavanaugh until he or the White House withdraws the nomination. And the Left will then viciously attack the next nominee put forth by President Trump as well. Pushing these strings of nominees and hearings all the way to the 2020 presidential election.

Then they will entrap Senator Grassley with his own words from 2016. “Let the next president decide.” Of course hoping that the next president is one of their own and not a re-elected President Trump. Make no mistake at all, that is the plan of the Left.

As for this 2nd accuser of sexual misconduct against Mr. Kavanaugh. It allegedly took place only a year or so later than the 1st alleged incident. When the alleged victim and perpetrator were both Freshmen in college. And this too happened at a party. No originality to the Left’s made up stories and I’m sensing a theme here too.

We are seeing a pattern of alleged behavior that is in close proximity to one other in time. This makes gives the illusion that Mr. Kavanaugh is a serial offender. Under-aged drinking is involved at wild parties. Again another painting of Mr. Kavanaugh wrongfully being presented as a heavy drinker and very irresponsible. And then the very alleged acts that take place leaves people to believe that Mr. Kavanaugh looses all self-control when he is drunk. All of these things paint the picture of someone not worthy to sit on the High Court.

And all of these things are a lie too. Carefully constructed by the Left to make it near impossible to dispute.

But since this alleged event took place at a college frat house. I’m sure there are plenty of witnesses that will come forward. And that a report was filed with the college at least. The name of the fraternity should be available. The date of the party should be also available. And it should be on record if Mr. Kavanaugh was even a member of the fraternity as a Freshman.

One should remind all parties that lying under oath at a Senate Hearing is a federal crime. This warning goes to the accusers, to Mr. Kavanaugh, and members of the Senate Committee as well.

We are in for a long fight against the Leftists.

 

Tiny D6 – A game system review

I’ve been a gamer (table top RPGs) for a long time. Way back to the beginning of the hobby. I’ve played or GMed in countless games and dozens of systems. I’ve been a TSRO, a playtester, a kickstart backer, published a game or two of my own, and chat host of some big names in the industry.

But today I’m going to talk about one of my top 3 game systems. And surprisingly this system isn’t one of those that has been around for decades like myself. This new system hit the table top originally in 2014 by Smoking Salamander and is now being published by Gallant Knight Games and is called Tiny D6.

Tiny D6 is a minimalist system with very light rules. All the bulk of most RPGs has been stripped away. It only uses six-sided dice so anyone can easily play without needing to obtain a set of polyhedral dice.

The basic rules are simple. You roll 2 dice, if either one of them is a 5 or 6 you succeed at your task. Very simple and easy. Sometimes you have Advantage, and you get 3 dice instead. And if you have Disadvantage, you get only 1 die to roll.

Currently there are 3 games that have been published in this line. The first was Tiny Dungeons for a fantasy style game, the 2nd is Tiny Frontiers for those who want science-fiction, and a post apocalyptic rule set of Tiny Wastelands. All of these are just basic rules. There are no hard settings and a lot is left up to the GM.

A 4th game is currently in the works and was a Kickstart project, a super hero game that is called Tiny Supers. This one, like the others before it will be basic rules. But also will include a compleat setting for the first time.

These are all great fantastic games and rules for running them. I like to tinker myself with game rules. And I’ve got a game setting that is a home-brew from 1983. And when I find a rule set that I like. I always convert it over. And Tiny D6 has that honor just like the other game systems that have been my favorites before it.

I think Tiny D6 is a great game system for both new and old players. The rules are simple and easy to understand. There are genres for the basics, including the upcoming Tiny Supers. And others coming in the future as well. Everyone will be able to find a game in the line that appeals to them directly.

Even younger kids could learn this system. And it works great around the gaming table, online chat, or even play-by-post.

I personally give this my recommendation to anyone looking for an RPG that isn’t the cookie cutter variety of the big guys.

 

Troubles with Twitter

Normally every post on this blog is sent to Twitter which should also automatically sent it to Facebook. However some time ago Facebook made a change and that broke the connection to Twitter.

We have attempted to regain that link but it is not working at this time. And requests to Twitter have basically been ignored by Twitter. Perhaps because the majority of posts from this blog are conservative in nature and Twitter is known to silence conservative voices.

For right now we do not have a workable solution to get the posts automatically to Facebook. But we will attempt to get them now to Instagram which is a popular social media outlet. And one that is increasing in popularity as well.

Maybe this will help with our circulation and we can have more readers to our site.

 

 

Burden of Proof

The alleged event took place 36 years ago. It was not a Federal Crime and therefore the FBI has rightly refused to investigate the matter further. Additionally it may have taken place in the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia. Even wrongfully assuming the alleged event was the highest felony sexual based crime. It has a statute of limitations of 15 years. So any charges or accusations should have been made at least 18 years ago it not before to be legally valid.

The Left insists that men who are accused of any sexually based crime are guilty until proven innocent. However, our Constitution and laws decree that the burden of proof is on the accuser and prosecution. And that all citizens are innocent until proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, guilty. The Left’s mindset is an abomination against Liberty and freedom within this Republic.

However we will look at the accusation to see if it has any merit what so ever, even though the accused cannot be charged or tried for the event due to the statute of limitations within the District of Columbia. According to Ms. Ford this is what happened 3 and a half decades ago.

When she was 15 years of age, she was at a high school party. This was a co-ed party with girls and boys attending. There was underage drinking going on and she admits that she had been drinking and was in fact drunk during this party.

Two boys, one being now identified as Supreme Court Nominee Mr. Kavanaugh, were also present. These 2 boys and herself were drunk and ended up alone in a bedroom at the house were the party was being held.

One of the boys covered Ms. Ford’s mouth to prevent her from screaming. The other boy, now identified as Mr. Kavanaugh, was on top of Ms. Ford.

However, since both boys had been heavily drinking they had fallen off the bed onto one another during their struggle with Ms. Ford. At this point Ms. Ford escapes from the two entangled boys.

What happened after that is not yet known. Did Ms. Ford leave the party or did she remain there? Where there any adults present at this party? These and more are questions that need to asked.

What is known is that the incident was never reported to an adult, a teacher, the police, or Ms. Ford’s parents. Had it been there would have been an entire chain of events that simply did not happen. It is believed that Ms. Ford did tell a few close friends about it but it was kept silent after that.

From my own experience, I too was 15 years of age at the same time. Back in 1982 when this event allegedly took place. I cannot remember a single thing in detail of what I did during that year. I can make some guesses of course but the accuracy would be in doubt. Add a drunken party to the mix and the odds go way down at recalling anything with any real accuracy about it.

Given that Ms. Ford admits to being drunk at this teenage party calls her entire accusation into question. Especially 36 years later. Did it happen as she said, did any of it happen at all? Or is it all a fabrication of lies?

Ms. Ford and her fellow Democratic Leftists call this alleged event “attempted rape”. That is very strong language to use on an event that was just “remembered” so recently from so long ago. At best, if was still chargeable, it would be assault.

Now I will admit that a teenage male has a lot of sexual tension, drive, and desires. That is indisputable, but not proof of attempted rape. And being drunk can lower ones inhibitions as well. This can happen with any drunk individual, teenager and adult. But it is still not proof of attempted rape. And no where in Ms. Ford’s telling of this event does it mention that either boy was without clothing or even had partial clothing. This does cast doubt on the attempted rape accusation.

On the accused side of this story is Mr. Kavanaugh. He states simply that the alleged event did not take place. But here, I do have to say that IF it did happen as Ms. Ford states, it is possible that Mr. Kavanaugh’s memory of the event is long gone and may not remember that it happened at all.

Also being drunk and being a minor does not excuse such behavior. It was assault if nothing more serious. But we will never know the true intent, if the event actually did take place. And as I stated at the beginning, this happened too long ago to be a legal issue.

In our political arena and climate this kind of accusation sets a dangerous president. To be able to accuse a member of an opposition party of sexual misconduct from an unprovable vantage point decades in the past in order to prevent that person from seeking and obtaining political office is evil. It destroys liberty and it undermines our Republic. It can ruin lives and careers both public and private. All from an accusation that is unprovable and in some cases maybe completely false.

The burden of proof is on the accuser or prosecution within our Republic. And this includes testimony before a Senate hearing.

Ms. Ford also does not state when and where exactly this party was located either. Casting further doubt on the event. Give this information and we can find where Mr. Kavanaugh was located then.

Ms. Ford has offered no proof and Mr. Kavanaugh denies the event. The 2nd boy is unknown. So there are no other witnesses to bring forth new information. There is also no DNA or other evidence at all. Nothing.

We only have the word of a Democratic Party member and donor. One who has been involved in protests against the current Administration. One who believes that the President is not her president. Ms. Ford’s own actions would indicate that she would be against any nomination made by the current Administration to the High Court, no matter the person’s character, qualifications, or even gender.

Ms. Ford has not protested or brought up accusations against Mr. Kavanaugh in his past appointments to the Federal Court system. He has been before the Senate Judicial Committee before and was confirmed by the Senate. No word of any sexual misconduct. Only now, when he is being nominated to sit on the High Court does she come forward with this accusation.

What Ms. Ford did do was to send a letter to Senator Feinstein, a Democratic Senator on the Judicial Committee. Senator Feinstein is a well known Leftist and her public statements show a strong bias against the male gender. Within Ms. Ford’s letter, she demanded that the FBI investigate the alleged event. Thankfully the FBI has refused this unauthorized demand on their time and funds. It accusation does not fall under FBI jurisdiction. Ms. Ford, if you want a private investigation, hire a private investigator to do it, the FBI is not at your disposal.

Senator Feinstein did exactly what the Democratic Senators accused Senator Grassely of doing on the 1st day of the hearing. Not giving out documents in time for them to be read. Senator Feinstein received Ms. Ford’s letter on July 30th. And sat on it until the 11th hour, only then revealing its existence in an attempt to stall the vote or deny the nomination in committee.

At the time of this writing, Ms. Ford has agreed to testify but not yet agreed to do so by the Monday deadline. She demands protections from the Republican Senators. Unless she is going into a witness relocation program, she isn’t entitled to any extra protections. She is not a witnesses but the accuser. Every citizen has the right to face their accuser.

She has been given a deadline, she either meets such deadline or doesn’t. She is then either subpoenaed and brought before the Senate Judicial Committee or is found in contempt if she does not appear and goes to jail. If she elects not to testify, then the Senate moves forward with their confirmation and the accusation is stricken from the record.

I personally would like her to come and testify. If the alleged event actually took place there are unanswered questions about it that need answers that only she can give. Yes it will be hard. That happens anytime someone in an other’s accuser. And I know there is a negative stigma attached to victims of sexual assault. That is unfortunate, but she needs to be strong.

I have already written about how I don’t think Mr. Kavanaugh should be on the bench at any level in our courts. He is part of the problem of black robed tyrants based on some of his testimony and other statements prior to his hearing. However, he is the best available candidate that can be put on the High Court bench at this time and place in our history.

And if such testimony of Ms. Ford removes all doubt to her accusation, then I will join those in stating Mr. Kavanaugh should not be confirmed. But that burden of proof is on Ms. Ford and Ms. Ford alone.